ECONOMY OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF MEXICO
Ecological Zones
The indigenous peoples inhabit four broadly defined ecological regions.
Table 7.3 Ecological Regions and Indigenous Peoples
|
Regions
|
Surface (hectares)
|
Estimated indigenous population
|
Estimated Indigenous population as % of Total Population
|
| Humid Tropics |
28,598,300 |
3,280,159 |
37.0 |
| Dry Tropics |
25,598,000 |
2,978,510 |
34.0 |
| Temperate Zone |
39,024,000 |
1,953,100 |
22.4 |
| Arid Zone |
102 |
489,818 |
5.6 |
Secretaría de Desarrollo Social
SEDESOL, 1994
17. These regions include 45 percent of the forested areas of the country
and municipalities with over 30 percent of estimated indigenous population.
For example, it is estimated that in Oaxaca 90 percent of the state’s forest
resources are located in indigenous lands, and many of the environmental
changes affecting Mexico today such as increasing deforestation, soil erosion,
water pollution, and desertification, also are occurring in regions inhabited
by these populations. These changes are the result of the imposition of
economic models that require a high use of fertilizer as well as of the
devastating impact of unsustainable extraction of timber from the forests.
18. The indigenous peoples have accessed the resources of these diverse
ecological regions through systems of customary tenure for hundreds, and
in some cases thousands, of years. The indigenous cultures we see today,
is the result of adaptations to these different natural areas and they
are repositories of enormous banks of knowledge, technologies, and strategies
for the appropriation of nature. The ecological knowledge possessed by
these people forms a part of the national patrimony of the country and
must be taken into account in development project planning and in the decision-making
process designating the location of natural protected areas or national
parks.
19. The native knowledge of specific ecological regions and their productive
systems are not as damaging, from a long-term sustainability perspective,
than other systems, since they operate as allies of nature, specifically
looking out for the conservation of biological diversity and culturally
significant landscapes.
In Mexico it is not possible to recognize and safeguard the natural
resource patrimony without respecting, at the same time, the indigenous
cultures and peoples who have given sense and are intimately involved in
the politics of conservation of nature in their regions.
Table 7.4 Natural Protected Areas in Indigenous Territories
|
Natural Protected Areas
|
National Total
|
Protected Areas in Indigenous Municipalities with Indigenous
Peoples >30%
|
| Biosphere Reserve |
22
|
8
|
| Special Biosphere Reserve |
13
|
6
|
| National Parks |
56
|
13
|
| Forestry Reserves |
16
|
4
|
| Protected Forested Areas |
202
|
11
|
| Special Fauna and Flora Protected Areas |
8
|
3
|
| National Monuments |
3
|
2
|
| Marine National Parks |
3
|
1
|
| Protected Zones of Marine Flora and Fauna |
2
|
2
|
| Parks |
1
|
1
|
| Total |
326
|
51
|
Source: Lucio Lara Plata, 1994: Indigenous Peoples and Natural
Protected Areas. Instituto Nacional Indigenista.
Factors Affecting the Degradation of Natural Resources
-
The national conservation policies have not consulted with the indigenous
peoples to ensure the population’s acceptance of these policies.
-
There is no ranking of the areas in the country by their ecological potential,
and according to the best use of the soils to maximize their rational economic
use.
-
Projects with colonization components and resettlement have not been planned
according to ecological criteria. This has resulted in negative environmental
impacts.
-
Traditional slash and burn systems of production conflict with the aim
of preservation and protection of the ecosystems. The expansion of the
agricultural land area has occurred at the expense of territories of indigenous
communities over other areas.
20. The analysis of impacts of the traditional technologies compared to
logging or building roads has not been systematically undertaken. Environmental
degradation drastically modifies the conditions of life of the indigenous
peoples. The most extreme levels of environmental degradation are found
especially in the areas of the Tarahumara Sierra, the Nayarit Sierra, the
Purepecha Mesa, the Chimalapas in Oaxaca, the Lacandon Jungle, the southern
portion of the Huasteca, the northern Sierra in Puebla, the Nahuatl region
of the Oaxaca-Puebla Canyon, the two Nahuatl regions of Veracruz, the Tlapaneco-Amuzgo
region of Guerrero, and almost the entire state of Oaxaca, in addition,
the petroleum extracting areas of Tabasco and Veracruz. Most of these areas
also have high levels of contamination of the rivers, lagoons, lakes, dams,
and water tables.
-
The official institutions charged with the implementation of conservation
and natural resource management programs are Ministry of Environment, Natural
Resources and Fisheries (SEMARNAP),
-
National Ecology Institute,
-
National Procurer for the Protection of the Environment (PROFEPA)
Table 7.5 Indigenous Regions Identified within the Priority
Conservation Areas
| Indigenous Region |
|
| I. Mayo |
Las Bocas (32) |
| II. Tarahumara |
Alta Tarahumara (43); Cañón
de Chinipas (44); Barrancas del Cobre (45); Montes Azules (46); Guadalupe,
Calvo y Mohinora (48) |
| III. Huicot |
Guacamayita (85); Sierra de Jesús
María (88); Sierra de Bolaños (90) |
| IV. Meseta Purépecha |
Tancítaro (111) |
| V. Huasteca |
Cañones de Afluentes del
Pánuco (103); Tlanchinol (104); Huayacocotla (105) |
| VI. Sierra Norte de Puebla |
Cuetzalan (118) |
| VII. Totonaca de Veracruz |
Encinares de Nautla (107) |
| VIII. Otomí |
Cañones de Afluentes del
Pánuco (103) |
| IX. Mazahua-Otomí |
Sierra de Chincua (114) |
| X. Náhuatl de las Costas
de Michoacán |
Sierra de Coalcomán (112) |
| XI. Meseta Chocho-Mixteca-Popoloca
de Puebla |
|
| XII. Náhuatl de la Cañada
Oaxaqueña-Poblana |
Tehuacán-Cuicatlán
(123); Sierra Granizo (124) |
| XIII. Náhuatl Jalapa Martínez
de la Torre de Veracruz |
|
| XIV. Náhuatl Orizaba-Córdoba
de Veracruz |
Perote-Orizaba (119) |
| XV. Popoluca-Náhuatl. Los
Tuxtlas de Veracruz |
Sierra de los Tuxtlas-Laguna del
Ostión (110) |
| XVI. Náhuatl Tlapaneco-Mixteco-Amuzgo
de Guerrero |
Cañón del Zopilote
(121) |
| XVII. Chontal de Tabasco |
Pantanos de Centla-Laguna de Términos
(135) |
| XVIII. Chiapas |
Selva Zoque (Chimalapas-Ocote-Uxpanapa)
(133); Huitepec-Tzontehuitz ( 138); La Chacona-Cañón del
Sumidero (139); El Suspiro-Buenavista-Berriozabal (140); Bosques Mesófilos
de los Altos de Chiapas (141); El Momón-Margaritas-Montebello (145);
Lacandona (Montes Azules-Marqués de Comillas-Cañada)(146) |
| XIX. Península de Yucatán |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147); Zonas
Forestales de Quintana Roo (149); Sian Kaan-Uaymil (150); Zona de Punto
Put (151); Centro-Sur de Cozumel (152); Isla Contoy (153); Dzilam-Ría
Lagartos-Yum-Balam (154); Petenes-Ría Celestum (155) |
| XX. Oaxaca |
Tehuacán-Cuicatlán
(123); Sierra Granizo (124); Sierra Trique (125); Sierra de Tidaa (126);
Sierra Norte de Oaxaca (127); Zimatlán (128); Río Verde Bajo
(129); Manglares de Chacahua-Manialtepec (130); Sierra Sur y Costa de Oaxaca
(131); Sierra Mixe-La Ventosa (132); Selva Zoque (Chimalapas-Ocote-Uxpanapa)
(133) |
Note: The indigenous regions are located primarily or entirely
in some of the high priority conservation areas. Source: Socio-Economic
indicators of the Indigenous Peoples of Mexico. INI, 1993; Priority Conservation
Areas. CONABIO/PRONATURA/WWF/USAID/TNC, 1997.
Table 7.6 Minority Indigenous Groups Identified
within Priority Resource
Conservation Areas (see map of Indigenous Regions)
| Indigenous Group |
State |
Municipalities |
Priority Conservation Areas
and Rank |
| Cucapá |
Baja California |
Mexicali |
Delta del Río Colorado,
Alto Golfo de California (14) |
| |
Sonora |
San Luis Río Colorado |
Delta del Río Colorado,
Alto Golfo de California (14) |
| Cochimí |
Baja California |
Ensenada |
Valle de los Cirios (8); Sierra
de Juárez (12) |
| Pai-pai |
Baja California |
Ensenada |
Valle de los Cirios (8)
Sierra de San Pedro Mártir (11) |
| Kiliwa |
Baja California |
Ensenada |
Valle de los Cirios (8) |
| Kumiai |
Baja California |
Ensenada y Tijuana |
Valle de los Cirios (8); Sierra
de Juárez (12) |
| Cahita |
Sinaloa |
Entre Ahome y Fuerte |
|
| |
Sonora |
Etchojoa |
|
| |
|
Navojoa |
Sierra de Álamos (33) |
| Seri |
Sonora |
Pitiquito |
Isla Tiburón-Sierra Seri
(19) |
| Yaqui |
Sonora |
Bacum y Cajeme |
|
| |
|
Guaymas |
Sierra Bacatete (31) |
| Pápago |
Sonora |
Caborca |
|
| Mayo |
Sinaloa |
Ahome y Fuerte |
|
| Pima |
Chihuahua |
Temosachi |
|
| |
|
Madera |
Cuarenta Casas (36) |
| |
Sonora |
Yecora |
Yécora-El Reparo (28) |
| Kikapú |
Coahuila |
Múzquiz |
Río San Rodrigo-El Burro
(51) |
| Chichimeca-Jonaz |
San Luis Potosí |
Tamasopo y Sta. Catarina |
|
| Matlatzincas |
Estado de México |
Temascaltepec y Zinacantepec |
Sierra de Taxco (116) |
| Ocuiltecos |
Estado de México |
Ocuilán y Tianguistengo |
Sur del Valle de México
(117) |
| Aguacateco |
Estado de México |
Atizapan de Zaragoza, Naucalpan
y Tlalnepantla |
|
| Ixcateco |
Oaxaca |
Nuevo Soyaltepec y Santa María
Ixcatlán |
Sierra Norte de Oaxaca (127) |
| Teco |
Veracruz |
Minatitlán |
|
| Cakchiquel |
Quintana Roo |
Othón P. Blanco |
Zonas Forestales de Quintana Roo
(149) |
| |
Chiapas |
Mazapa de Madero |
Selva Espinosa Chicomuselo-Motozintla
(144) |
| Kekchi |
Quintana Roo |
Othón P. Blanco |
Zonas Forestales de Quintana Roo
(149) |
| |
Campeche |
Champotón |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147) |
| Quiché |
Quintana Roo |
Othón P. Blanco |
Río Hondo (148) |
| |
Campeche |
Champotón |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147) |
| |
Chiapas |
Huitiupán, Tapachula, Suchiate
y Frontera Hidalgo |
|
| Kanjobal |
Campeche |
Champotón |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147) |
| Jacalteco |
Campeche |
Champotón |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147) |
| |
Quintana Roo |
Othón P. Blanco |
Zonas Forestales de Quintana Roo
(149) |
| Ixil |
Campeche |
Champotón |
Silvituc-Calakmul (147) |
| |
|
Campeche |
|
| |
Chiapas |
Villa Corzo |
|
| |
Quintana Roo |
Othón P. Blanco |
Zonas Forestales de Quintana Roo
(149) |
| Lacandón |
Chiapas |
Ocosingo |
Lacandona (Montes Azules-Marqués
de Comillas-Cañada) (146) |
| Tzotzil |
Chiapas |
La Trinitaria |
|
| Tojolabal |
Chiapas |
Las Margaritas |
Lacandona (Montes Azules-Marqués
de Comillas-Cañada) (146) |
| |
|
La Concordia, Villa Corzo |
|
| Kanjobal |
Chiapas |
La Independencia |
El Momón-Margaritas-Montebello
(145) |
| |
|
Las Margaritas, Chicomuselo |
|
| Jacalteco |
Chiapas |
Amatenango de la Frontera |
Selva Espinosa Chicomuselo-Motozintla
(144) |
| |
|
La Trinitaria, Frontera Comalapa
y La Grandeza |
|
| Motozintleco |
Chiapas |
Villa Comaltitlán y Huixtla |
Triunfo-Encrucijada-Palo Blanco
(142) |
Note: The indigenous regions are located primarily or entirely
in some of the high priority conservation areas.
Source: Socio-Economic indicators of the Indigenous Peoples
of Mexico. INI, 1993; Priority Conservation Areas. CONABIO/PRONATURA/WWF/USAID/TNC,
1997.
Land Tenure
21. The use of land by the indigenous peoples was perturbed with the establishment
of the hacienda system, which permanently affected land tenure. To this
day, there are communities and small towns established in the same place
as they were over 2,500 years ago. Theirs has been an occupation of land
which has been permanent and is an illustration of the historic sustainability
of these systems and their people and cultures.
There are different forms of land tenure in the indigenous
areas of the country.
a) Communal Property. Includes a territory which
may (a) belong to a community; (b) belong to several communities and sometimes
be the capital of the municipality. The communal assembly charged with
electing the traditional authorities, governors, principals, municipal
presidents, and municipal agents regulates use of land. The Agrarian Reform
stipulates that the agrarian authorities are autonomous and not subject
to the official system composed of:
| Community Resources Commissar |
President
Secretary
Treasurer
Substitute personnel for each of these three positions. |
| Oversight Council |
President
Secretary
Treasurer
Substitute personnel for each of these three positions |
| Auxiliary Judge |
Substitute |
| Municipal Delegate |
Link between the community and
municipal authorities. |
Communal goods are distributed in agricultural plots that are utilized
temporarily in a slash and burn system. This system requires leaving the
land fallow for a period of several years. Possession of all the land is
in the hands of the members of the communities. There are other plots within
the same system, which are given to the members of the community and their
families. The latter can inherit these lands, or they can be exchanged
among the members of the community, but the land does not have the category
of private property. The community also controls the lands with forests,
those lands not apt for agricultural production but that may have other
uses, or common property resources including forests and mining. The most
important feature of this system is that the land cannot be sold to persons
not belonging to the community.
b) Indigenous Ejidos. Those lands given to communities
that lacked any previous documentation of occupancy after the Revolution.
These areas are currently operating and organized under the same norms
as the communal lands.
c) Indigenous ejidos operating under the norm of the Agrarian
reform Law. These are a minority and individually divided. According
to the modification of Article 27 of the Constitution, the owners can opt
for private titling or for the maintenance of communal ejido property.
(The change in Article 27 of the Constitution in 1992 permits the privatization
of the ejidos after sixty years where sale and land alienation was
prohibited).
22. Examples of the two extremes of land tenure types are the States
of Oaxaca and Yucatan. In the first type, there is a predominance of communal
lands (67 percent) in Oaxaca and in the second, 90 percent are in ejidos.
These three categories of property are controlled by a total of 6,298 registered
indigenous communities in the country according to the 1991 Census of the
Ejidos. They possess nearly 22 million hectares and about 1.1 million
hectares are rainfed. The areas with grazing lands total 9 million hectares;
and those with tropical forests or temperate forests total 7 million hectares.
Other land use types cover a total of 340,000 hectares. The per capita
incomes vary greatly among different regions and communities. There are
communities with high incomes because of their rich resource base, as is
the case of Nuevo San Juan Paranguaricuticuaro in Michoacan. In other cases,
there are communities in dire poverty because of land degradation and scarce
natural resources, as is the case of the high areas of the Mezquital Valley
in the State of Hidalgo.
Instituto de Ecología, UNAM
|